PostgreSQL

38.16.1. Extension Files

38.16.2. Extension Relocatability

38.16.3. Extension Configuration Tables

38.16.4. Extension Updates

38.16.5. Installing Extensions using Update Scripts

38.16.6. Security Considerations for Extensions

38.16.7. Extension Example

A useful extension to PostgreSQL typically includes multiple SQL objects; for example, a new data type will require new functions, new operators, and probably new index operator classes. It is helpful to collect all these objects into a single package to simplify database management. PostgreSQL calls such a package an extension. To define an extension, you need at least a script file that contains the SQL commands to create the extension’s objects, and a control file that specifies a few basic properties of the extension itself. If the extension includes C code, there will typically also be a shared library file into which the C code has been built. Once you have these files, a simple CREATE EXTENSION command loads the objects into your database.

The main advantage of using an extension, rather than just running the SQL script to load a bunch of “[.quote]#loose”# objects into your database, is that PostgreSQL will then understand that the objects of the extension go together. You can drop all the objects with a single DROP EXTENSION command (no need to maintain a separate “[.quote]#uninstall”# script). Even more useful, pg_dump knows that it should not dump the individual member objects of the extension — it will just include a CREATE EXTENSION command in dumps, instead. This vastly simplifies migration to a new version of the extension that might contain more or different objects than the old version. Note however that you must have the extension’s control, script, and other files available when loading such a dump into a new database.

PostgreSQL will not let you drop an individual object contained in an extension, except by dropping the whole extension. Also, while you can change the definition of an extension member object (for example, via CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION for a function), bear in mind that the modified definition will not be dumped by pg_dump. Such a change is usually only sensible if you concurrently make the same change in the extension’s script file. (But there are special provisions for tables containing configuration data; see Section 38.16.3.) In production situations, it’s generally better to create an extension update script to perform changes to extension member objects.

The extension script may set privileges on objects that are part of the extension, using GRANT and REVOKE statements. The final set of privileges for each object (if any are set) will be stored in the pg_init_privs system catalog. When pg_dump is used, the CREATE EXTENSION command will be included in the dump, followed by the set of GRANT and REVOKE statements necessary to set the privileges on the objects to what they were at the time the dump was taken.

PostgreSQL does not currently support extension scripts issuing CREATE POLICY or SECURITY LABEL statements. These are expected to be set after the extension has been created. All RLS policies and security labels on extension objects will be included in dumps created by pg_dump.

The extension mechanism also has provisions for packaging modification scripts that adjust the definitions of the SQL objects contained in an extension. For example, if version 1.1 of an extension adds one function and changes the body of another function compared to 1.0, the extension author can provide an update script that makes just those two changes. The ALTER EXTENSION UPDATE command can then be used to apply these changes and track which version of the extension is actually installed in a given database.

The kinds of SQL objects that can be members of an extension are shown in the description of ALTER EXTENSION. Notably, objects that are database-cluster-wide, such as databases, roles, and tablespaces, cannot be extension members since an extension is only known within one database. (Although an extension script is not prohibited from creating such objects, if it does so they will not be tracked as part of the extension.) Also notice that while a table can be a member of an extension, its subsidiary objects such as indexes are not directly considered members of the extension. Another important point is that schemas can belong to extensions, but not vice versa: an extension as such has an unqualified name and does not exist “[.quote]#within”# any schema. The extension’s member objects, however, will belong to schemas whenever appropriate for their object types. It may or may not be appropriate for an extension to own the schema(s) its member objects are within.

If an extension’s script creates any temporary objects (such as temp tables), those objects are treated as extension members for the remainder of the current session, but are automatically dropped at session end, as any temporary object would be. This is an exception to the rule that extension member objects cannot be dropped without dropping the whole extension.

The CREATE EXTENSION command relies on a control file for each extension, which must be named the same as the extension with a suffix of .control, and must be placed in the installation’s SHAREDIR/extension directory. There must also be at least one SQL script file, which follows the naming pattern `extension--version.sql` (for example, foo--1.0.sql for version 1.0 of extension foo). By default, the script file(s) are also placed in the SHAREDIR/extension directory; but the control file can specify a different directory for the script file(s).

The file format for an extension control file is the same as for the postgresql.conf file, namely a list of `parameter_name `= `value assignments, one per line. Blank lines and comments introduced by `# are allowed. Be sure to quote any value that is not a single word or number.

A control file can set the following parameters:

In addition to the primary control file `extension.control, an extension can have secondary control files named in the style extension--version.control. If supplied, these must be located in the script file directory. Secondary control files follow the same format as the primary control file. Any parameters set in a secondary control file override the primary control file when installing or updating to that version of the extension. However, the parameters `directory and default_version cannot be set in a secondary control file.

An extension’s SQL script files can contain any SQL commands, except for transaction control commands (BEGIN, COMMIT, etc) and commands that cannot be executed inside a transaction block (such as VACUUM). This is because the script files are implicitly executed within a transaction block.

An extension’s SQL script files can also contain lines beginning with \echo, which will be ignored (treated as comments) by the extension mechanism. This provision is commonly used to throw an error if the script file is fed to psql rather than being loaded via CREATE EXTENSION (see example script in Section 38.16.7). Without that, users might accidentally load the extension’s contents as “[.quote]#loose”# objects rather than as an extension, a state of affairs that’s a bit tedious to recover from.

While the script files can contain any characters allowed by the specified encoding, control files should contain only plain ASCII, because there is no way for PostgreSQL to know what encoding a control file is in. In practice this is only an issue if you want to use non-ASCII characters in the extension’s comment. Recommended practice in that case is to not use the control file comment parameter, but instead use COMMENT ON EXTENSION within a script file to set the comment.

Users often wish to load the objects contained in an extension into a different schema than the extension’s author had in mind. There are three supported levels of relocatability:

In all cases, the script file will be executed with search_path initially set to point to the target schema; that is, CREATE EXTENSION does the equivalent of this:

This allows the objects created by the script file to go into the target schema. The script file can change search_path if it wishes, but that is generally undesirable. search_path is restored to its previous setting upon completion of CREATE EXTENSION.

The target schema is determined by the schema parameter in the control file if that is given, otherwise by the SCHEMA option of CREATE EXTENSION if that is given, otherwise the current default object creation schema (the first one in the caller’s search_path). When the control file schema parameter is used, the target schema will be created if it doesn’t already exist, but in the other two cases it must already exist.

If any prerequisite extensions are listed in requires in the control file, their target schemas are added to the initial setting of search_path, following the new extension’s target schema. This allows their objects to be visible to the new extension’s script file.

For security, pg_temp is automatically appended to the end of search_path in all cases.

Although a non-relocatable extension can contain objects spread across multiple schemas, it is usually desirable to place all the objects meant for external use into a single schema, which is considered the extension’s target schema. Such an arrangement works conveniently with the default setting of search_path during creation of dependent extensions.

Some extensions include configuration tables, which contain data that might be added or changed by the user after installation of the extension. Ordinarily, if a table is part of an extension, neither the table’s definition nor its content will be dumped by pg_dump. But that behavior is undesirable for a configuration table; any data changes made by the user need to be included in dumps, or the extension will behave differently after a dump and restore.

To solve this problem, an extension’s script file can mark a table or a sequence it has created as a configuration relation, which will cause pg_dump to include the table’s or the sequence’s contents (not its definition) in dumps. To do that, call the function pg_extension_config_dump(regclass, text) after creating the table or the sequence, for example

Any number of tables or sequences can be marked this way. Sequences associated with serial or bigserial columns can be marked as well.

When the second argument of pg_extension_config_dump is an empty string, the entire contents of the table are dumped by pg_dump. This is usually only correct if the table is initially empty as created by the extension script. If there is a mixture of initial data and user-provided data in the table, the second argument of pg_extension_config_dump provides a WHERE condition that selects the data to be dumped. For example, you might do

and then make sure that standard_entry is true only in the rows created by the extension’s script.

For sequences, the second argument of pg_extension_config_dump has no effect.

More complicated situations, such as initially-provided rows that might be modified by users, can be handled by creating triggers on the configuration table to ensure that modified rows are marked correctly.

You can alter the filter condition associated with a configuration table by calling pg_extension_config_dump again. (This would typically be useful in an extension update script.) The only way to mark a table as no longer a configuration table is to dissociate it from the extension with ALTER EXTENSION ... DROP TABLE.

Note that foreign key relationships between these tables will dictate the order in which the tables are dumped out by pg_dump. Specifically, pg_dump will attempt to dump the referenced-by table before the referencing table. As the foreign key relationships are set up at CREATE EXTENSION time (prior to data being loaded into the tables) circular dependencies are not supported. When circular dependencies exist, the data will still be dumped out but the dump will not be able to be restored directly and user intervention will be required.

Sequences associated with serial or bigserial columns need to be directly marked to dump their state. Marking their parent relation is not enough for this purpose.

One advantage of the extension mechanism is that it provides convenient ways to manage updates to the SQL commands that define an extension’s objects. This is done by associating a version name or number with each released version of the extension’s installation script. In addition, if you want users to be able to update their databases dynamically from one version to the next, you should provide update scripts that make the necessary changes to go from one version to the next. Update scripts have names following the pattern `extension--old_version--target_version.sql` (for example, foo--1.0--1.1.sql contains the commands to modify version 1.0 of extension foo into version 1.1).

Given that a suitable update script is available, the command ALTER EXTENSION UPDATE will update an installed extension to the specified new version. The update script is run in the same environment that CREATE EXTENSION provides for installation scripts: in particular, search_path is set up in the same way, and any new objects created by the script are automatically added to the extension. Also, if the script chooses to drop extension member objects, they are automatically dissociated from the extension.

If an extension has secondary control files, the control parameters that are used for an update script are those associated with the script’s target (new) version.

The update mechanism can be used to solve an important special case: converting a “[.quote]#loose”# collection of objects into an extension. Before the extension mechanism was added to PostgreSQL (in 9.1), many people wrote extension modules that simply created assorted unpackaged objects. Given an existing database containing such objects, how can we convert the objects into a properly packaged extension? Dropping them and then doing a plain CREATE EXTENSION is one way, but it’s not desirable if the objects have dependencies (for example, if there are table columns of a data type created by the extension). The way to fix this situation is to create an empty extension, then use ALTER EXTENSION ADD to attach each pre-existing object to the extension, then finally create any new objects that are in the current extension version but were not in the unpackaged release. CREATE EXTENSION supports this case with its FROM `old_version option, which causes it to not run the normal installation script for the target version, but instead the update script named extension--old_version--target_version.sql. The choice of the dummy version name to use as old_version is up to the extension author, though `unpackaged is a common convention. If you have multiple prior versions you need to be able to update into extension style, use multiple dummy version names to identify them.

ALTER EXTENSION is able to execute sequences of update script files to achieve a requested update. For example, if only foo--1.0--1.1.sql and foo--1.1--2.0.sql are available, ALTER EXTENSION will apply them in sequence if an update to version 2.0 is requested when 1.0 is currently installed.

PostgreSQL doesn’t assume anything about the properties of version names: for example, it does not know whether 1.1 follows 1.0. It just matches up the available version names and follows the path that requires applying the fewest update scripts. (A version name can actually be any string that doesn’t contain -- or leading or trailing -.)

Sometimes it is useful to provide “[.quote]#downgrade”# scripts, for example foo--1.1--1.0.sql to allow reverting the changes associated with version 1.1. If you do that, be careful of the possibility that a downgrade script might unexpectedly get applied because it yields a shorter path. The risky case is where there is a “[.quote]#fast path”# update script that jumps ahead several versions as well as a downgrade script to the fast path’s start point. It might take fewer steps to apply the downgrade and then the fast path than to move ahead one version at a time. If the downgrade script drops any irreplaceable objects, this will yield undesirable results.

To check for unexpected update paths, use this command:

This shows each pair of distinct known version names for the specified extension, together with the update path sequence that would be taken to get from the source version to the target version, or NULL if there is no available update path. The path is shown in textual form with -- separators. You can use regexp_split_to_array(path,'--') if you prefer an array format.

An extension that has been around for awhile will probably exist in several versions, for which the author will need to write update scripts. For example, if you have released a foo extension in versions 1.0, 1.1, and 1.2, there should be update scripts foo--1.0--1.1.sql and foo--1.1--1.2.sql. Before PostgreSQL 10, it was necessary to also create new script files foo--1.1.sql and foo--1.2.sql that directly build the newer extension versions, or else the newer versions could not be installed directly, only by installing 1.0 and then updating. That was tedious and duplicative, but now it’s unnecessary, because CREATE EXTENSION can follow update chains automatically. For example, if only the script files foo--1.0.sql, foo--1.0--1.1.sql, and foo--1.1--1.2.sql are available then a request to install version 1.2 is honored by running those three scripts in sequence. The processing is the same as if you’d first installed 1.0 and then updated to 1.2. (As with ALTER EXTENSION UPDATE, if multiple pathways are available then the shortest is preferred.) Arranging an extension’s script files in this style can reduce the amount of maintenance effort needed to produce small updates.

If you use secondary (version-specific) control files with an extension maintained in this style, keep in mind that each version needs a control file even if it has no stand-alone installation script, as that control file will determine how the implicit update to that version is performed. For example, if foo--1.0.control specifies requires = 'bar' but foo’s other control files do not, the extension’s dependency on `bar will be dropped when updating from 1.0 to another version.

Widely-distributed extensions should assume little about the database they occupy. Therefore, it’s appropriate to write functions provided by an extension in a secure style that cannot be compromised by search-path-based attacks.

An extension that has the superuser property set to true must also consider security hazards for the actions taken within its installation and update scripts. It is not terribly difficult for a malicious user to create trojan-horse objects that will compromise later execution of a carelessly-written extension script, allowing that user to acquire superuser privileges.

Advice about writing functions securely is provided in Section 38.16.6.1 below, and advice about writing installation scripts securely is provided in Section 38.16.6.2.

SQL-language and PL-language functions provided by extensions are at risk of search-path-based attacks when they are executed, since parsing of these functions occurs at execution time not creation time.

The CREATE FUNCTION reference page contains advice about writing SECURITY DEFINER functions safely. It’s good practice to apply those techniques for any function provided by an extension, since the function might be called by a high-privilege user.

If you cannot set the search_path to contain only secure schemas, assume that each unqualified name could resolve to an object that a malicious user has defined. Beware of constructs that depend on search_path implicitly; for example, IN and CASE +`_`+expression`+ WHEN+` always select an operator using the search path. In their place, use OPERATOR(`schema.=) ANY` and `CASE WHEN +`_`+expression`.

A general-purpose extension usually should not assume that it’s been installed into a secure schema, which means that even schema-qualified references to its own objects are not entirely risk-free. For example, if the extension has defined a function myschema.myfunc(bigint) then a call such as myschema.myfunc(42) could be captured by a hostile function myschema.myfunc(integer). Be careful that the data types of function and operator parameters exactly match the declared argument types, using explicit casts where necessary.

An extension installation or update script should be written to guard against search-path-based attacks occurring when the script executes. If an object reference in the script can be made to resolve to some other object than the script author intended, then a compromise might occur immediately, or later when the mis-defined extension object is used.

DDL commands such as CREATE FUNCTION and CREATE OPERATOR CLASS are generally secure, but beware of any command having a general-purpose expression as a component. For example, CREATE VIEW needs to be vetted, as does a DEFAULT expression in CREATE FUNCTION.

Sometimes an extension script might need to execute general-purpose SQL, for example to make catalog adjustments that aren’t possible via DDL. Be careful to execute such commands with a secure search_path; do not trust the path provided by CREATE/ALTER EXTENSION to be secure. Best practice is to temporarily set search_path to 'pg_catalog, pg_temp' and insert references to the extension’s installation schema explicitly where needed. (This practice might also be helpful for creating views.) Examples can be found in the contrib modules in the PostgreSQL source code distribution.

Cross-extension references are extremely difficult to make fully secure, partially because of uncertainty about which schema the other extension is in. The hazards are reduced if both extensions are installed in the same schema, because then a hostile object cannot be placed ahead of the referenced extension in the installation-time search_path. However, no mechanism currently exists to require that.

Here is a complete example of an SQL-only extension, a two-element composite type that can store any type of value in its slots, which are named “[.quote]#k”# and “[.quote]#v”#. Non-text values are automatically coerced to text for storage.

The script file pair--1.0.sql looks like this:

The control file pair.control looks like this:

While you hardly need a makefile to install these two files into the correct directory, you could use a Makefile containing this:

This makefile relies on PGXS, which is described in Section 38.17. The command make install will install the control and script files into the correct directory as reported by pg_config.

Once the files are installed, use the CREATE EXTENSION command to load the objects into any particular database.

Privacy Policy | Code of Conduct | About PostgreSQL | Contact

Copyright © 1996-2023 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group